Hacker Cinema
Batman Forever
1995 · Film · 121 min
Part of Batman Collection
Directed by Joel Schumacher
Batman faces off against two foes: the schizophrenic, horribly scarred former District Attorney Harvey Dent, aka Two-Face, and the Riddler, a disgruntled ex-Wayne Enterprises inventor seeking revenge against his former employer by unleashing his brain-sucking weapon on Gotham City's residents. As the caped crusader also copes with tortured memories of his parents' murder, he has a new romance, with psychologist Chase Meridian.
1 positive2 negative1 neutralfrom 4 commenters
Where to watch
No streaming data for this title.
4 comments on Hacker News
>I doubt this movie will ring true with the bulk of audiences.
This should be the least important quality of a film, and ironic that you mention this quality along with Batman Forever, which did ring true with the bulk of audiences and was Warner Bros. most successful film for six years until Harry Potter was released.
Movies are not their scripts or their directors. Movies are products of a complex situation, a confluence of influences. Those influences bleed into the film. A movie about soldiers filmed in a rain-soaked jungle will itself drip with the suffering that went in its creation. A movie filmed about a new york architect, filmed in a New York nightclub, with a cast of Hollywood socialites ... that's how you get Batman Forever. I doubt this movie will ring true with the bulk of audiences.
> This isn't the mud and rain of movies like Apocalypse Now. This reeks of the money and elitisms of Battlefield Earth or Batman Forever.
This is bloody brilliant and ranks among the best HN comments I’ve ever encountered. It’s pure poetry and ends with the words “Batman Forever”, a staggering creative achievement.
Well, I suppose we can do what the batman movies, or Gundam series do. Batman, Batman Returns, Batman Forever, Batman Begins. Gundam Wing, Gundam Turn A, Gundam Seed.
Web. Web Social. Web Ubiqu. Web Singularity.
I guess most hackers don't like the term web/bubble 2.0/3.0 is because it's overloaded, and hence, imprecise. Thus, ripe for exploitation by marketers, which generally have a bad rep with hackers (sometimes with good reason).
I think the author just means "the next evolutionary step of the web" Just as when people are talking about 2.0, they just mean that the web now was far different than it was back in 1996.