Hacker CinemaPlayboy
角色2之花花公子
2014 · Film · 91 min
Directed by Ma Xiaohui
Mark tells the story of the hero lose yourself in the maze of paper drunk fast-paced world, the first girlfriend from college was abandoned and then fell in love with wealthy daughter Coco, the last monarch of Columbia because coco father strongly opposed and insults, Mark decidedly left coco, vowed to become a high society people, since then they disappear, two years after the re-emergence of Mark drove a Ferrari, lived in luxury, who do not know him in the end what has been done in two years? Wang Wei, the emergence of wealthy few, let Coco, Mark, and he's turned into a love triangle relationship, a strong Wei insidious little in order to get coco, exhausted all means! After the king's brother against Wei less vertical cross grab gear, marks the final decision of the prodigal son with coco fly away, but God did not give the prodigal son and a look back ...
3 neutralfrom 3 commenters
Where to watch
No streaming data for this title.
3 comments on Hacker News
But it's the internet; for every one site that implements this, there will be a thousand that don't, and for every one that the government takes down, another thousand will pop up. And that's just the actual porn sites, there's millions of other ways to get access, be it websites, privacy-conscious apps, file sharing, etc. If people want porn they'll find it.
Of course, it being more difficult, technically involved, or otherwise shady will probably reinforce a message that it's not normal, because another issue is the normalization of porn to the point where people watch it in public. I'm also very aware I am just echoing the same thing an older generation has said about things like raunchy video clips on MTV, magazines like Playboy, movies with Marilyn Monroe, and painters painting a hint of ankle.
> I don’t know what you mean by “children” or what you’re reacting to exactly, since I didn’t make any specific claims about children
I’m reacting to this: “Imagine if female teachers put up Chippendale’s posters in the classroom, or nurses put them in the hospital, and argued that anyone who complained was just being PC police and unreasonably sensitive”
I don’t have a strong position on Lena elimination, I just think that comparing the situation to teachers or nurses hanging up an explicit or sex-related poster is ridiculous. I brought up children because I think the reason why teachers or nurses hanging up posters like that is obviously offensive is that those are professions which have a large and direct day to day exposure in-person to children. Image processing researchers do not share this trait, so the comparison is invalid IMO. If you said the same about, say, mechanics or factory workers, professions without direct exposure to children, I don’t think it would be as obviously offensive.
> we demand the right to keep using a pinup in research
It isn’t itself a pinup, it looks like a still from a regular film and the image itself isn’t explicit at all. I think calling it a “pinup in research” is an exaggeration. The fact that it is actually from Playboy is sort of an in-joke in the field, since I don’t think anyone naively looking at the image would think that (I certainly didn’t when I first saw it).
> we have a history of accidentally excluding women from tech
Do you honestly believe that things like Lena have a significant effect here? I think women’s perception of tech being a place for men is primarily influenced by it being, in fact, full of men. Spending time on matters like this is counterproductive because it makes people working to improve equality in the field seem petty.
> Do you consider female… college students to be children?
Absolutely not, and I find the idea insulting to female college students. Women having children at that age is accepted in our society, so I have no idea how they could themselves be considered children without seriously altering the functional definition of the word child.
I disagree there are fundamental differences. The reason Apple is blocking game streaming apps is because games could contain content that violates the standards of the app store.
An easy violation is nudity, there is an app for Playboy, but there is zero nudity in it. However, I can get the full, uncensored Playboy magazine in the Nook app. I can watch movies with nudity in Netflix or Amazon Video. I can even buy or rent movies FROM APPLE with nudity in the iTunes store, like Eyes Wide Shut, Walk Hard, Boogie Nights (which is about porn!), and Barbarella, all right from my iPad or iPhone.
So why can I see nudity if I buy it directly from Apple in a movie, but not an app?
I can download the Twitch app and watch streams of video games, but I can't download an app to let me PLAY the very same games?
There is no difference, it is simply Apple capriciousness.