Hacker Cinema
Poster for Project X

Project X

2012 · Film · 88 min

Directed by Nima Nourizadeh

Comedy

Three high school seniors throw a party to make a name for themselves. As the night progresses, things spiral out of control as word of the party spreads.

1 positive4 neutralfrom 5 commenters

IMDbTMDBTrends

Where to watch

No streaming data for this title.

Videos commenters linked

From YouTube links in the comments below. Most are clips and trailers; “Full” means the uploader says so.

6 comments on Hacker News

  1. Neutralc_o_n_v_e_xFeb 20, 2023

    33 Thomas street is viewable. Interesting to see such a tall windowless building in the middle of the city, really gets the imagination going.

    From Wiki:

    "33 Thomas was described as the likely location of a NSA mass surveillance hub codenamed TITANPOINTE,[1] in an investigation by The Intercept, and in a documentary short film by Henrik Moltke and Laura Poitras titled Project X, both drawing on the surveillance disclosures of Edward Snowden. The investigation ties the facility to a nearby Federal Bureau of Investigation building, and its rooftop equipment to NSA's SKIDROWE satellite intelligence system.[18][1]"

  2. PositiveJerry2Nov 17, 2019

    This video about 33 Thomas St building was awesome:

    >Field of Vision - Project X

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOJugaGK0eU

    >A top-secret handbook takes viewers on an undercover journey to Titanpointe, the site of a hidden partnership. Narrated by Rami Malek and Michelle Williams, and based on classified NSA documents, Project X reveals the inner workings of a windowless skyscraper in downtown Manhattan.

    >Directed by Laura Poitras and Henrik Moltke.

  3. Neutral_mulder_Feb 28, 2013

    >People download things which they either do not have access to or do not value enough to pay for

    Yes, THIS!

    I think this is the crux of the entire argument that is completely ignored by nearly every content producer. People value things differently for a huge number of reasons. With things with a personal appeal like music, or maybe TV/Film but I imagine less so, some people will pay more for their favourite band, others won't. That means the band is undervaluing their product to their greatest fans (good for the fans) and over valuing for their lesser fans.

    Normally, when I download things, it's because I don't value the product at the price it's being sold, but I do still value it! Film is a great example of this. I'll happily pay $5 to rent a great film like Django unchained, or Avatar, etc. But am I going to pay the same amount for the (boringly bad) Bourne Legacy? No. But I would still pay something to see it.. perhaps $1, maybe $2. But I can't because there is no option to do this. So instead, I would consider downloading it.

    So what have the film company lost when I chose to pirate instead of purchase? Not $5 because I wouldn't have paid this in the first place. So they've lost $2. And what have I lost? I've had to spend some of my time hunting down and waiting for the film to download (A minor inconvenience) but that's it. So seems like the only loser is the film company.

    For evidence, look at the most highly downloaded film of 2012 'Project X'. IMDB gives it a 6.6 rating and it sounds a bit lame but fun. Exactly the sort of film that isn't worth full price rental.

    Or perhaps that's just how I see things..

  4. Neutralw1ntermuteJan 1, 2013

    > No, not everyone uses Adblock, in fact only 9-10% of users have it. The highest average is 17% for tech sites [1]. Most people have no fucking clue what that is.

    This doesn't change the fact that the problem can be easily solved. Your girlfriend getting lost after 10 years of browsing is something that can be solved in 10 seconds. When I said that everyone I know uses it, my point wasn't that everyone in the world uses it, it was that it's not so difficult to use Adblock that people won't use it once they're told about it.

    > I have no idea what flavor of Google you use, but piratebay is not even among the top 15 results for Project X: http://cl.ly/image/0R1K2z2V0O3z. Your search history is probably reflecting on your results.

    I don't know why you're seeing those results, but not only did I search in an incognito window to avoid my search history biasing my results, personally I use private torrents almost exclusively, so my Google torrent search history is quite limited.

    > Now look at this: http://cl.ly/image/1x302r3g383I. Tell me more about idiots.

    I have never seen that site before, nor do I recommend it to anyone that I know. There are bad sites out on the internet - who would have guessed?

    > Third, no, a lot a people have absolutely no clue about the difference between 720p/1080p. It's not about being stupid, they just don't care enough.

    Well, that's good, because on Netflix, most content is not even available in 1080p, and even when it is, it's not accessible on many devices. Hell, I've seen tons of stuff that isn't even in HD.

    And most people can't tell the difference in quality between 720p and 1080p anyway, so what difference does it make which one they download?

    > Fourth, there are plenty torrents around with crappy audio, either low volume, distorted or mono, specially for new releases. Your own experiences don't apply to everyone.

    Please point me to some examples. And I'm not talking about crappy cams. I would never suggest watching a cam over going to a theater, if the experience is important for you.

    The only reason for audio issues with a DVD or Bluray rip would be improper encoding, and such a release would just be ignored.

    > Finally, yes, I do use Netflix daily and subtitles are a menu click away, and available for every video.

    No, they are not. That is blatantly incorrect. I just logged into Netflix and opened a random TV show. There were only subtitles available in English. They only had a 4:3 480p video option. Please explain how this is an optimal experience again?

    And Netflix is not really a valid comparison in any case, since the available content is horribly limited.

  5. NeutralricardobeatJan 1, 2013

    I'll try to gloss over your disrespect and get straight to the subject. No, not everyone uses Adblock, in fact only 9-10% of users have it. The highest average is 17% for tech sites [1]. Most people have no fucking clue what that is.

    I have no idea what flavor of Google you use, but piratebay is not even among the top 15 results for Project X: http://cl.ly/image/0R1K2z2V0O3z. Your search history is probably reflecting on your results.

    Now look at this: http://cl.ly/image/1x302r3g383I. Tell me more about idiots.

    Third, no, a lot a people have absolutely no clue about the difference between 720p/1080p. It's not about being stupid, they just don't care enough.

    Fourth, there are plenty torrents around with crappy audio, either low volume, distorted or mono, specially for new releases. Your own experiences don't apply to everyone.

    Finally, yes, I do use Netflix daily and subtitles are a menu click away, and available for every video. Same goes for DVD/BR, which I haven't watched in years. Clearly you don't watch subtitled movies, so what are you arguing for?

    Enjoy your bubble.

    [1] http://www.quora.com/What-is-the-percentage-of-Internet-users-that-employ-AdBlock-Plus-or-similar-ad-blocking-plugins

  6. Neutralw1ntermuteDec 31, 2012

    > You have to know what to look for. Torrent tracker sites are full of advertising that look like download buttons. My girlfriend still gets lost after a decade of web browsing.

    This is a completely separate issue that can be easily solved with Adblock. Everyone I know uses it, even those who don't know much about tech.

    I just searched for the most pirated movie of 2012, Project X, on Google. I typed in "project x torrent". The first link took me to a Pirate Bay page for a DVD rip[0], while the second link was for a HD version. You would have to be a real idiot not to know how to download from a page that clearly says "GET THIS TORRENT" in red letters. I cannot think of anyone I know who cannot do this, and there are plenty of people I know who have very little computer experience.

    In fact, I find Netflix's UI quite a bit more confusing.

    > You also have to choose the correct quality, or decide between filesize/quality.

    Oh yes, it is so difficult to understand the difference between DVD rip and 720p Bluray rip. Come on, you deal with this same problem if you go to the store to buy a movie on disc! People are not that stupid.

    > Check that audio is good.

    This is 100% FUD. I have no other response. If you are downloading a DVD or Bluray rip, there is no reason to worry about audio quality.

    > If you're watching with non-native english speakers, go hunting for a subtitle track that syncs with your chosen file... not straightforward at all.

    Have you used a DVD or Bluray disc or Netflix lately? Is it easy to enable subtitles? Are they even included in all discs/videos?

    > For most people it's easier to download a .exe and click next/ok blindly than do all those steps. I believe the Steam model would fare quite well with the movie/music industry, though netflix or amazon instant might win.

    It's not a matter of whether it's easier, it's a matter of how much easier it is. It's a tradeoff between price and convenience. My point is that the tradeoff tilts in favor of the paid option for PC video gaming, but tilts in favor of piracy for movies and TV shows (for a la carte purchases).

    0: http://i.imgur.com/IHu9b.png