Hacker Cinema
Flashman
1967 · Film · 96 min
Directed by Mino Loy
Superhero Flashman--who is secretly a member of the British royal family--battles a host of villains and gangsters, including Mafia bank robbers and a gang of beautiful female counterfeiters.
2 positive2 neutralfrom 4 commenters
Where to watch
No streaming data for this title.
4 comments on Hacker News
Try The Four Feathers by AEW Mason, if you haven’t. There are also two or three film adaptations, can be fun to see where and how each deviated from the book. And maybe King Solomon’s Mines by H Rider Haggard.
More British old-timey adventuring, though without so many ships.
If you want an antihero-rake and a tale told tongue firmly in cheek, see if the Flashman novels by Fraser are to your liking. Fraser takes a rich school-bully character from a more wholesome series of books and imagines his military & adventuring career in adulthood.
> I honestly can't tell if it's meta-parody. And that's why I'll keep watching.
I'm kinda in the same boat. But I think one of the things I like about Curtis is that he's made me read more about things I didn't know about.
For example I'd never given much thought about Afghanistan (other than Afghan coats) until the Soviet Union invaded. I was an early teenager (I'm in my mid 50s now), but reasonably interested in world politics, and even back then, and the Afghan war seemed like another cold war proxy conflict, and same old same old.
There were many events like that for me, and then I bumped into Curtis in 1992 and his Pandora's box series and I was sort of wowed at his take on the world. These wee snippets of, often obscure, history made tantalisingly accessible and fascinating by the way he assembles his final cuts, so much so that I went off and bought books on history rather than be informed by the opinion pieces in the Times (London), The Guardian etc. I will caveat that I realise history books are not free of bias.
Whatever he's doing I think it's a good thing. Sure he often reaches no conclusions but he throws many ideas at us to make us think. Maybe proper historians rue the day he got the cart blanch from the BBC to make these films and series and don't find them "academic" enough. And maybe his work is just a form of meta-parody art, but there's always something in these films to tickle your grey matter.
Finally, if anyone's interested in a docu-fictional story about the British Empire's comeuppance in Afghanistan the I'd recommend the first book in George MacDonald Fraser's "Flashman" series:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flashman_(novel)
No, people have tried to "cancel" Tarantino for things that he's done, said, or been associated with: https://theconversation.com/tarantino-has-a-questionable-record-in-the-metoo-context-so-should-we-boycott-his-new-film-121985
(stunt negligence resulting in serious injury to Uma Thurman is probably the most serious)
Meanwhile, Flashman is so obviously himself an anti-hero and a parody of the Boys' Own style. Flashman himself does not paint a good picture of the Empire.
> "George MacDonald Fraser’s 1969 novel ‘‘Flashman,’’ about a wealthy misfit who, because of a series of misunderstandings, earns a reputation as a war hero."
That's a series of books, actually, and it's not a "wealthy misfit", it's a complete scoundrel who's very amusing from a safe distance.
They probably should make it a TV series for the 'yooths' to learn from.
(What's with the up-the-right-nostril portrait photography in that piece?)